tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post2265163597050512848..comments2023-09-09T07:28:35.681-04:00Comments on Science and Religion: A View from an Evolutionary Creationist: More on the JPL Dust-UpJimpithecushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10143519573877156940noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post-28647630444187992512010-04-20T15:29:47.505-04:002010-04-20T15:29:47.505-04:00Mr. Coppedge's attorney may argue that Intelli...<i>Mr. Coppedge's attorney may argue that Intelligent Design is science and does not fall under the restrictions to which religious speech is subject.</i><br /><br />But the suit, as <a href="http://www.sgvtribune.com/news/ci_14909557" rel="nofollow">reported here</a>, alleges discrimination based on religion. If Coppedge's attorney argues that intelligent design is science and not religion, then that basis for the suit evaporates, it seems to me, and it becomes something like a non-religious free speech issue.RBHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13562135000111792590noreply@blogger.com