tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post5269079643284998270..comments2023-09-09T07:28:35.681-04:00Comments on Science and Religion: A View from an Evolutionary Creationist: The Evil of ScienceJimpithecushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10143519573877156940noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post-44517175574522150742012-02-15T23:25:55.890-05:002012-02-15T23:25:55.890-05:00Thanks for the clarification, and I appreciate you...Thanks for the clarification, and I appreciate your response. I completely agree that science cannot prove God's existence, and I can see why you would interpret it that way. In my case, my first thought was that the T-shirt was trying to make the point that science had "ruined" God, not just that it couldn't "prove him".Dan D.http://withallmymind.netnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post-36046163754454931792012-02-15T13:18:51.206-05:002012-02-15T13:18:51.206-05:00You know, I thought about that when I posted it an...You know, I thought about that when I posted it and how I interpreted it when I read it was “proof of God's existence” which is the ID position. It was not until after I posted it that it struck me that one could interpret it in different ways. Did not mean to offend.Jimpithecushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10143519573877156940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post-68880986636334856472012-02-15T00:28:32.211-05:002012-02-15T00:28:32.211-05:00I would also think it was funny except that it lum...I would also think it was funny except that it lumps God in with geocentrism and unicorns. I've enjoyed reading your blog as someone who is also a Christian and scientist, but this post has me puzzled. This is my first comment here, but I have to ask: were you being sarcastic or something more subtle than that? Certainly you don't think that science has "ruined" God, given the thrust of your blog?Dan D.http://withallmymind.netnoreply@blogger.com