tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post6433534403547980717..comments2023-09-09T07:28:35.681-04:00Comments on Science and Religion: A View from an Evolutionary Creationist: A Tour of The Ark ConstructionJimpithecushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10143519573877156940noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post-45615827992072785992016-03-31T22:59:00.462-04:002016-03-31T22:59:00.462-04:00I trust my further comment - flagging an AiG respo...I trust my further comment - flagging an AiG response to Ambrosino - was received.ashleyhrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04408129014757944228noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post-30798052003622189562016-03-31T18:28:55.856-04:002016-03-31T18:28:55.856-04:00I agree that the Bible is irrelevant in the pursui...I agree that the Bible is irrelevant in the pursuit of an accurate model of reality. Scientific doubt is superior to dogma of any kind including Christian dogma.Davidnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post-18182162702664187472016-03-31T12:23:21.651-04:002016-03-31T12:23:21.651-04:00I see that AiG's Jeanson is whinging that peop...I see that AiG's Jeanson is whinging that people like Ambrosino don't read enough of their literature. He then cites some technical stuff written by him - NONE OF WHICH was published in a peer reviewed SCIENTIFIC journal:<br />https://answersingenesis.org/ministry-news/ark-encounter/when-hostility-helps/ashleyhrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04408129014757944228noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post-57643746335945174542016-03-31T11:39:08.936-04:002016-03-31T11:39:08.936-04:00I really wish Ambrosino had asked Jeanson why it i... I really wish Ambrosino had asked Jeanson why it is that an ever-increasing number of Evangelical Christians accept Evolution as a biological process which is part of God's creation. But I imagine the answer will contain something about creeping apostasy or some such.<br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07285815810018813701noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post-25586410626967339122016-03-30T19:11:45.013-04:002016-03-30T19:11:45.013-04:00It's a thorough article, and AiG won't muc...It's a thorough article, and AiG won't much like it!<br /><br />“The word ‘dinosaur’ is an arbitrary term invented in the 19th century for a family of land animals.” Another attempt by Ken Ham to bamboozle. The term was coined in the 19th century - long after the Bible was written - because dinosaurs have been extinct for a very very long time and are only known from fossils, ie there is nothing 'arbitrary' it's simple history and it explains exactly why nothing like a huge dinosaur is ever mentioned or alluded to in Genesis (and YECs have to seize upon Job 40 and make that describe a 'dinosaur').<br /><br />Meanwhile, this looks like good clean fun and I'm about to check it out:<br />http://www.theologyforthechurch.com/?p=1873<br />https://answersingenesis.org/natural-selection/speciation/does-ken-ham-embrace-evolution/ashleyhrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04408129014757944228noreply@blogger.com