tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post7762537021559178211..comments2023-09-09T07:28:35.681-04:00Comments on Science and Religion: A View from an Evolutionary Creationist: More on Ardipithecus ramidusJimpithecushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10143519573877156940noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post-63960436256769902692009-10-09T11:16:57.823-04:002009-10-09T11:16:57.823-04:00BTW, I have never seen a mail server treat HTML as...BTW, I have never seen a mail server treat HTML as malicious code. That's a new one.Jimpithecushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10143519573877156940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post-10865758423596436262009-10-09T11:16:15.577-04:002009-10-09T11:16:15.577-04:00Steve, I have contacted you directly and responded...Steve, I have contacted you directly and responded. I tried doing it within the confines of this space and discovered that google/blogger only had a 4096 character limit. Let me know if it helps. I adapted it from one of my lectures.Jimpithecushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10143519573877156940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post-55384467168327490302009-10-08T23:16:51.493-04:002009-10-08T23:16:51.493-04:00This certainly gets more interesting as time goes ...This certainly gets more interesting as time goes by!<br /><br />One thing I'm completely out of my depth on: many times over the years I have heard people who accept evolution complain loudly when a creationists says that we descended from apes (I have at times parroted this myself). "No, humans and apes have a common ancestor. We descended from ape-like ancestors, not apes." Do they just mean "modern apes" or is "ape" a generic enough classification that this criticism is essentially much ado about nothing?<br /><br />I ask because this NYT article says things like, "The hands were more like those of extinct apes." Are they being sloppy, or is this completely acceptable terminology?Stevehttp://undeception.comnoreply@blogger.com