tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post2776931614560753138..comments2023-09-09T07:28:35.681-04:00Comments on Science and Religion: A View from an Evolutionary Creationist: Casey Luskin Invokes Need for Tennessee HB 368Jimpithecushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10143519573877156940noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post-73362123933141982992011-05-12T12:52:10.755-04:002011-05-12T12:52:10.755-04:00Yes the “cdesign proponentsists” is quite a howl a...Yes the “cdesign proponentsists” is quite a howl and a good catch phrase to keep handy whenever an ID supporter states that there is no connexion between ID and recent earth creationism. <br /><br />As I said, I “would like” to have an open mind about the bill. Since it has been yanked, the point is moot, but in truth, I never did have an open mind about it. Every bill I have ever seen that has been drafted to promote “academic freedom” has been a smokescreen to try to eradicate teaching of evolution. <br /><br />This is one of the reasons that Steve Matheson dislikes the ID movement so intensely: it is not clear that they are above board about anything they do.Jimpithecushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10143519573877156940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19722540.post-4500574677814351522011-05-12T08:57:17.384-04:002011-05-12T08:57:17.384-04:00Interesting article. I had never seen the "C...Interesting article. I had never seen the "Cdesign proponentists" thing, I got a good chuckle out of that :]<br /><br />I'm atheist but I respect your approach to this issue. The only part I took some exception to was the bit about desiring to have an open mind about HB 368 (you accidentally typed "HB 836" at the end). Let's not encourage them, lol.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com