A Republican state representative calls it a matter of academic freedom.And out it comes. Funny how "existing scientific theories" becomes "evolution and global warming." Bloom doesn't care about anything but evolution. He probably couldn't even describe it but that doesn't matter. What if the student disagrees with the teaching because they think the earth was created six thousand years ago? How much time should be spent on that?
Science-education advocates claim it's nothing but a backdoor attempt to allow public schools to discuss Bible-based creationism.
Rep. Stephen Bloom (R., Cumberland) circulated a memo to his colleagues Thursday seeking cosponsors for planned legislation to allow students in public elementary and secondary schools to question or critique "the scientific strengths and weaknesses of existing scientific theories."
In an interview, Bloom said the purpose of his bill was not to supplant what is now taught in classrooms - including, he said, evolution and global warming - but to foster an atmosphere that allows for a free exchange of ideas if a student were to question or disagree with the teaching.
"In the real world, outside of academia, scientific theory is up for all kinds of argument," Bloom said. "I don't think it's right to exclude any particular kind of argument prima facie. If a student wants to discuss a criticism, he or she should be able to."
The only reason people like Bloom think that scientific theory is up for all kinds of argument is because they have no idea what a scientific theory is. The only reason science happens at all is because people like Bloom don't have a say in it.
They don't call it the "stupid party" for nothing.