That was fast. The sound of one hand clapping? Now, it's no hands. Besieged by a furious mob of censors, the editors at the peer-reviewed journal PLOS ONE have retracted a paper on the "architecture" of the human hand that repeatedly invoked notions of "design" and a "Creator."This was in the works so it is not a surprise that it happened. It is true that there was a good deal of hand-waving in the process but the claims had no place in a paper of that sort. Then Klinghoffer writes this:
I must note here that the theory intelligent design does not infer a "Creator," a religious idea that goes beyond what the scientific evidence says. ID infers a source of intelligence, and leaves it to others to argue about the identity of the source.This comment is illogical on its face and cuts to the heart of the position that the Discovery Institute has tried to take. Something either arose by chance or it was created. It cannot be neither. If it did not arise by chance, which is the position of many of the DI fellows on different aspects of our anatomy (eye, blood-clotting cascade), then it was created. If it was created, then by whom or what? ID absolutely does infer a creator.
While it is quite true that they do their best to deflect attention away from the Christian God as the source of these creations, it was shown pretty conclusively at Dover that the two are linked at the hip. This is further exacerbated by public pronouncements by prominent ID proponents such as William Dembski that ID represents the Logos of John's Gospel restated in information theory (1999) as well as their preferred choice of venues for conferences.
That being said, whether or not it is the Christian God or Cosmic Muffin, it is a “creator.”