Deb Wolf, a high school science instructional coach for the Sioux Falls School District, worries the bill would also undermine school boards' ability to enforce the curriculum they've approved.The passage of any of these bills would set a terrible precedent. Science is not like any other discipline. You are not entitled to your own set of facts. That simply is not how the world works.
"This is horrible, but let's say I believe in eugenics," Wolf said. "(SB 55) says that I couldn't be prohibited, I couldn't be stopped from teaching that as long as I did it in an objective scientific manner, and it doesn't specify what that means."
The bill now moves to the House where, if passed, it will go to the governor's desk for final approval.
Rachelle Smith, who has two children at John Harris Elementary School, was in disbelief that the bill was even under consideration.
Smith worries the bill, if passed, would cause parents to try to avoid certain teachers or request to change classes if a teacher strayed from science curriculum.
She also worries that her second-grade daughter, who loves studying science, won't be learning the subject properly.
Friday, January 27, 2017
Update on the South Dakota Bill
The Argus Leader is running a story about the South Dakota “Strengths and Weaknesses” bill being bandied about.