The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod passed a resolution at their convention affirming the belief that God created the Earth “in six natural days.”As noted in the article, there is some debate about what the word “natural” means in this context.
At the 67th Regular Convention of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod on Tuesday, the theologically conservative denomination adopted Resolution 5-09A, titled “To Confess the Biblical Six-Day Creation.”
“We confess that the duration of those natural days is proclaimed in God’s Word: ‘there was evening and there was morning, the first day,’” resolved the resolution.
The resolution also declared that the creation of Adam as the first human being was a “historical event” and rejected the claims of the theory of evolution.
Another delegate expressed concern over the alleged “lack of clarity” on the definition of the word “natural” as used in the resolution.This has always struck me as a peculiar defense given how the scriptures actually reads:
Supporters responded that the term “natural” was defined by the Bible’s own words, describing the days as having an evening and a morning.
14 And God said, “Let there be lights in the vault of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark sacred times, and days and years, 15 and let them be lights in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth.” And it was so. 16 God made two great lights—the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars. 17 God set them in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth, 18 to govern the day and the night, and to separate light from darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fourth day. (Genesis 1:14-19, NIV)Every translation reads pretty much the same way. That happens on the fourth day. Without the sun and moon, you cannot have “evening and morning.” There is no reasonable context for it. To argue this implies that the entire universe revolves around a 24-hour earth day. We know this is not so.
It is notable that the vote was 662 in favor and 309 against, so there is quite a bit of dissent about the resolution. The rider involving evolution, while not taking center stage, is a slap in the face to those congregants who accept it. The rising science of coalescence theory is hard to square with the idea of Adam and Eve being the first humans. As Dennis Venema and Scot McKnight put it in their book Adam and the Genome,
As our methodology becomes more sophisticated and more data are examined, we will likely further refine our estimates in the future. That said, we can be confident that finding evidence that we were created independently of other animals or that we descend from only two people just isn’t going to happen. Some ideas in science are so well supported that it is highly unlikely new evidence will substantially modify them, and these are among them: The sun is at the center of our solar system, humans evolved, and we evolved as a population.I always find it somewhat interesting that these large denominations fight tooth-and-nail over social issues that are somewhat fluid in society, such as homosexuality and female ordination, and yet, for issues in which there is actually hard, scientific evidence, retreat to a very flat, conservative interpretation of scripture.
Interestingly, the new T-shirt being issued by the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America celebrates both science and LGBT rights. That is not true for the science part.
No comments:
Post a Comment