The Grey Lady puts out a story in which the Archbishop of Canterbury has come down on the opposite side of ID. NYT login may be necessary. The cleric states:
I think creationism is, in a sense, a kind of category mistake, as if the Bible were a theory like other theories. Whatever the biblical account of creation is, it's not a theory alongside theories. It's not as if the writer of Genesis or whatever sat down and said, 'Well, how am I going to explain all this?'
He also noted that opposing creationism in a curriculum is not the same as talking about how creation came about. Good article.
Update: It seems that NYT has since placed this article behind its "Times Select" wall and it is no longer accessible. That is too bad.