He gets very few of the details correct but his general gist is. He seems to be taking the view that Adam is a specially appointed person picked by God to be the first person to walk with God. As Davis Young points out, however, this effectively means that there were quite a few “pre-Adamites” walking around before this with uncertain spiritual identities. Robertson is a master of understatement when he says that “...we haven't worked all the wrinkles out...” Interestingly, the article then points this out:
Robertson may have to take this up with his own TV network, which promotes Young Earth Creationist material and publishes articles claiming that opposition to Young Earth Creationism is heretical.The second article takes the point of view that death could not have occurred before Adam's sin or else Jesus’ atonement would be null and void and that this constitutes a “...direct attack on the foundation and message of the Cross.” There is then a hat tip to AIG and Ken Ham. Throughout the article, there is absolutely no attempt made to grapple with any of the scientific data. It is as if it simply is wrong, no matter what it yields. This is a variant of the “Man's word versus God's word” argument that Ham is so fond of using.