To me, the whole issue hinges on honesty. Let me explain: Science, from a Latin word meaning knowledge, is simply a search for trustworthy facts. It is human intelligence at work. The process is honest, because every researcher’s claim is challenged by other researchers. They test and retest by many methods, until a new idea fails or holds firm. (A researcher who falsifies data is a loathsome criminal in the eyes of fellow scientists.)
While some individual scientists are pig-headed, an entire field cannot be. Science goes where the evidence leads. Science is honest enough to admit mistakes. When new evidence shatters a previous assertion, the old belief is dropped or modified. No such setbacks have hit the theory of evolution.After 140 years of research, virtually the entire scientific world now agrees that evolution is a fundamental aspect of nature.
Thursday, June 04, 2020
An Honest Evolution Debate?
James Haught once wrote a column, now appearing in the Good Men Project on how science is an honest endeavor. He writes:
As you might guess, there are quite a few people who would disagree with this perspective. It is, nonetheless, true.