The lies told by opponents of evolution are practically endless.I am often reminded of Ken Ham's smug response to scientists that confront him with data. He simply responds that we both have the same data, we just interpret it differently. The catch is that he does so without any scientific testing, rendering his conclusions scientifically invalid.
There are no intermediate fossil forms between major groups? A lie.
Methods for dating rocks are unreliable and give contradictory results? A lie.
Many scientists are beginning to doubt evolution? A lie.
These are not mere differences of opinion; they are deliberate misrepresentations or outright denials of published facts.
I have read more anti-evolution literature than just about anyone in this area, and I have done something most other readers have not — check it against real science. I can tell you flatly it is all junk.Duane Gish? Ken Ham? Answers in Genesis? Discovery Institute? Philip Johnson? Michael Behe? Junk, all of it, with not a shred of scientific value.
Now playing: Eric Tingstad & Nancy Rumbel - Elysian Fields